Why does The BBC Subsidise The Guardian To The Tune of £100 a year per genuine Guardian purchaser ?
Jonathan Stuart-Brown for Save The British Film Industry.
Little hinges control the biggest doors. The BBC has more power and influence in The UK (via several national TV channels, national radio channels, its all powerful website and moreover it owning most of the magazines people see on display in shops ) than any other organisation. Moreover, because of the first fifty years of its history, when it was run on Judeo-Christian morality and the highest standards of honesty and love for every part of The UK, it developed a level of absolute trust for news coverage that is not easily broken.
Now Peter Sissons, the 20 year anchorman trusted News face of The BBC, confirms that at national West London level it is controlled by leftwing Marxists who have a strong anti-Christian agenda and that every news staff member knows that to cross the left wing groupthink of the bosses is to end your career.
How did this cancer get into The BBC ?
How did it turn from force for good (and for God) to force for evil ?
The soul tie got in when The BBC started placing all its recruitment advertising with The Guardian newspaper. The Guardian has only 250 000 sales and falling. Moreover, it actually has only 50 000 genuine sales and falling fast. The rest are all paid for by public money. Every library buys it. So does every University (including many different Departments), Quango, Charity, Union, many school staffrooms, public subsidised Theatre, Arts College, and of course The BBC buy lots of copies.
The BBC is giving The Guardian £100 a year (from public money) for every genuine Guardian purchaser. This is wrong. The BBC as a result is peopled by Guardian readers who are only 0.000833% of the population and mostly from West London. A weird bunch indeed who despise the UK population as a whole and would brainwash and control them by any means without any conscience. They see them in the way people used to see slaves. They are not democrats nor believers that people have equal value, dignity and worth. Yet it is the money of the masses which fund the existence of The Guardian and BBC Guardian reading bosses. The Guardian is the Bible of BBC bosses and news editors. A false one but one they believe with 100% zeal and they are evangelical for it.
The BBC has a massive website. It is in the top 45 most visited websites in the world. It is in the top ten in The UK. It has over 2 million pages. It could advertise for free on this website. Of course if it did, anyone could see the jobs on offer. This must not be permitted. The only people allowed to see them are The Guardian readers ( a dwindling group indeed). Moreover, The BBC bosses uses its recruitment millions to subsidise its religion and Bible: The Guardian. If it did not, this paper would go out of business and take its anti-British values with it.
The BBC has a soul tie with The Guardian values. These are: leftwing; anti-free enterprise; anti-free speech; pro-Soviet Government ‘1984’ Big Brother control over every thought of every adult and child; high tax; anti-marriage; anti-Bible; anti-Jesus; pro-abortion on an industrial scale; pro- murdering the elderly because they are old; anti-love of family; anti-love of town and region; anti-love of nation; anti-love of history; anti-love of every terrorist group (the more violent the better); hatred of Israel; hatred of The USA; religious belief in global warming; religious belief in one world global government (of which it would wish to be the official Pravda newspaper); anti-free and fair scientific debate; anti-good manners; anti-kindness and mercy; pro- nihilism; mocking the elderly; mocking the non-West London elite; pro-anarchism and prepared to let the masses of people in Britain be starved of access to the media and to electricity to heat their homes.
The BBC has caught the disease and determined to infect the entire nation.
The Guardian also seems to have a hatred of young pretty women, which for the moment The BBC has not gone along with. But that is the only difference which suggests The Invasion of The Bodysnatchers is not quite complete.
Both The BBC and Guardian claim they are multi-ethnic, mulri-racial and multi-cultural. This is a lie. Whatever your skin colour or ethnicity, they hate you if you do not show unquestioning obedience to their religious beliefs and leftwing bias.
Yes there are good people at The Guardian (but they are not the hinges which control the doors and do not last if they protest or go off message). Yes there are very good people still left at The BBC but if they go off message, or show signs of challenging the biased news coverage and hatred of Judeo-Christian values and honest reporting, then they lose their BBC career.
Yes the BBC entertainment is excellent (but should be on its multi-billion budget) but this is a smokescreen to cover its biased news coverage and determination to destroy The Judeo-Christian belief and morality which built Britain.
The BBC decides which political leaders are acceptable. David Cameron got the Conservative leadership because he was The BBC management candidate. Most candidates are unacceptable to them. They see themselves as the ones to choose and never to give every candidate a fair impartial chance.
They exclude trusted scientists from BBC News or Science programmes (we could name 300) such as David Bellamy because he has too much integrity to say that global warming is true and scientific. It has cost him a huge sum of money and fame, because he will not bow to The BBC management lie. He is fighting The Soviet demon which somehow moved West after 1989. They can not tolerate an honest man they can not bully nor buy. The BBC bosses hatred and fear of Dr Richard A E North is an axiom.
The BBC bosses have their £8 billion pension pot invested in carbon trading which will be worthless if global warming is exposed as a lie. Their religion is coupled with venal greed.
Top management greed at The BBC, and the notion of public service meaning grabbing Lottery Billions each year for themselves, was utterly unknown 20 years ago. Now it is normal.
The BBC gets 85% of its income (enforced by criminal law) from outside London but spends 85% of its revenue inside London, almost all in West London. It subsidises West London sucking the life, energy, vitality from the regions. In an era in which all private sector investment in any industry follows media infrastructure, The BBC has become unelected kingmaker of which regions prosper and which die. Closing its second biggest TV Centre in Birmingham saw private sector investment in the region stop almost overnight.
The BBC can be managed, although it requires axing all the senior management. It can be turned around. It needs tremendous prayer and immense courage. The BBC can become a force for good again.
The first move is cutting forever its inexcusable subsidy of The Guardian and breaking the soul tie with this newspaper whose genuine readers and perverted values only represents 0.000833 of the population.